Crime & Punishment

Crime and justice comment and analysis

Parents’ comments minimize Mayerthorpe reality

with 4 comments

Three years ago I was sitting in a lounge in the Calgary airport when my Blackberry first started buzzing with information about a multiple shooting of RCMP officers in Mayerthorpe, Alberta.  The original information was sketchy but all too soon the horrors perpetrated by James Roszko were all too clear.

Four young police officers, good Canadian boys, were dead.  Ambushed and cut down in the prime of their young lives by a man not fit to shine their boots.

Roszko, in true cowardly fashion, took his own life when another member attending from Edmonton returned Roszko’s fire and wounded him.  Roszko crawled back into that Quonset hut which housed his marijuana grow op and chop shop and took his pathetic life.

The nation was shocked at the news and watched with heavy hearts as the Mounties gathered in record numbers in Edmonton to pay tribute to their fallen comrades.

But once the tears were shed and four young men laid to rest, investigators had to piece together what happened.  How was Roszko able to get back onto his property and ambush the police officers? 

Their investigation led to the arrest of two other young men who ultimately were the answer to that question.  They not only provided Roszko with a weapon, but they drove him to his property knowing full well he was going to do what he did.  And they did nothing to stop him. 

Dennis Cheeseman and Shawn Hennessey were charged with being parties to the offence of first degree murder times four which, by law, is the applicable charge when the victim is a police officer.

Then began the predictable nonsense from friends and family of the two men. They were good boys don’t you know?  They were pillars of the community and all that crap that seems ubiquitous in the mainstream media whenever someone does something horrid.  Reporters dutifully trot out and talk to family, friends and neighbours  who then utter banalities about what a nice man he was and I would have never imagined he could do something so awful . . .blah, blah, blah.  It’s all so predictable.. 

The two accused last month pled guilty to reduced charges of manslaughter and were sentenced to 13 and 15 years respectively.  Which frankly, given the callous and deliberate manner that they enabled Roszko to do what he did, was not enough.  As far as I am concerned they should die in prison if there was justice in this country.

Last week, on the anniversary of the killings, I read a news story where the families of these young men are planning to appeal their convictions even though they pled guilty.  They are still maintaining their precious little children are really angels and did what they did because they were afraid of Roszko and … boo-hoo-hoo. 

Well, in the first instance I don’t buy the “afraid” nonsense.  Had they alerted the police, Roszko would have not ambushed the murdered officers and the chance of him being able to exact any revenge on them would have been remote, at best.  Secondly, one of the pair was partnered with Roszko in his illicit activities in the Quonset.  He had much more to gain from Roszko’s successful ambush of the Mounties than not. 

And that one fact alone should not be overlooked when we listen the families’ whine about their good boys.  Perhaps, had the whining parents done a better job of educating their whelps in the concept of consequences for bad actions, then four young RCMP members might still be alive today. 

And their prattle about appeals in this matter show they still haven’t grasped the concept.

Leo Knight

primetimecrime@gmail.com

Advertisements

Written by Leo Knight

March 10, 2009 at 4:00 am

Posted in Crime & Punishment

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Ideally they should have been given 4 separate life sentences, not the 25 years then parole. Actually they should have been hung, but I’d settle for them never getting out. Given the proliferation of addle headed lieberal’s that infest the justice system and the civil service, I wouldn’t be suprised if they get their sentances chopped or get a new trial.

    Anonymous

    March 11, 2009 at 4:40 am

  2. They’ll probably only serve 7 or 8 years at Club Fed and come out as better, hardened criminals, and be even more of a threat to society, with new ties they didn’t have before. I do not believe in corrections, people don’t change.

    Anybody who attacks a peace officer, or is a party to it, is an enemy of the entire public. One day they will get theirs; we will never forget. One day it will be open season on all criminals, if Canada ever becomes WROL.

    Anonymous

    March 11, 2009 at 5:19 pm

  3. You might consider their Canadian cultural aclimatization and give some credit for their fear, it is pretty standard in this country for some very rough criminals to remain in the community, often for years while awaiting trial. Unfortunately it is quite realistic to consider that they rat the guy out and, violent and dangerous though he is, they’ll likely meet him on main street within a few days. Sad but true…

    Anonymous

    March 13, 2009 at 4:18 am

  4. Well, you are right to suggest that many people who shouldn’t be on the streets often are in this country. But I object to your use o the word “rat” in this case. I have some difficulty with applying that term to alerting the police to an armed lunatic with murder in his heart. To me, that sound much more like duty than ratting.

    Anonymous

    March 15, 2009 at 3:23 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: